Intro; Acknowledgements; Contents; List of Figures and Tables; Table of Cases; 1. Introduction; I. Structure of the Book; II. Style; 2. Research Methodology; I. Research Parameters; II. Interviews; 3. Legitimacy and Authority; I. Persuasive Authority; II. The Influence of Domestic v Supranational Jurisprudence; III. Conclusions; 4. The Purpose of Foreign Jurisprudence; I. Many Minds; II. Decoration; III. Courtesy; IV. Supplements; V. Consensus; VI. Conclusions; 5. Foreign Jurisprudence in the UK Supreme Court; I. The Extent to Which Foreign Jurisprudence is Used
II. The Individual Approaches of the JusticesIII. Accessing Foreign Jurisprudence; IV. The Influence of Common Law Jurisdictions; V. The Effect of Changing Judgment Styles; VI. Conclusions; 6. Foreign Jurisprudence as a Heuristic Tool; I. Gap Filling; II. An Analytical Lens; III. Reassurance; IV. Conclusions; 7. The Pursuit of a Common Enterprise; I. Using Foreign Jurisprudence to Promote Uniformity; II. Uniformity under the Human Rights Act; III. The Absence of a Supranational Court; IV. Conclusions; 8. Instrumental Uses of Foreign Jurisprudence; I. To Confirm or Bolster Conclusions
II. The Absence of Strasbourg JurisprudenceIII. 'Departing' from Strasbourg; IV. Conclusions; 9. Conclusions; I. An Absence of Guiding Principles; II. The Individual Approaches of the Justices; III. Foreign Jurisprudence as a Heuristic Tool; IV. Providing a Given Audience with Reasons; V. The Effect of Changing Working Methods; VI. Reflections on Judicial Reasoning at the Supreme Court; Appendix 1: UK Supreme Court Appointments 2009-17; Appendix 2: Interview Design; Bibliography; Index
