| Description |
1 online resource (xv, 216 pages) |
| Contents |
Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs -- Copyright -- Preface -- REVIEWERS -- Acronyms -- Contents -- Executive Summary -- ABSTRACT -- THE COMMITTEE'S TASK -- MAJOR FINDINGS -- RECOMMENDATIONS -- CONCLUDING REMARKS -- 1 Introduction, Background, and Definitions -- ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT -- A SHORT HISTORY OF HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES -- MORE RECENT EVENTS -- Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments -- The National Bioethics Advisory Commission |
|
Reports from DHHS Office of the Inspector GeneralShutdowns of Clinical Research at Academic and VA Medical Centers -- The Death of Jesse Gelsinger -- A CALL FOR ACCOUNTABILITY -- STATEMENT OF TASK -- DEFINITIONS -- Subject or Participant? -- What Is a Human Research Participant Protection Program? -- The Centrality of Informed Consent -- The Rise of Clinical Trials and Privately Funded Research -- Nonbiomedical Research -- Independent IRBs -- Sponsors -- The Role of the Research Participant -- Research Monitoring -- Accreditation Versus Certification |
|
2 Models of AccreditationMODELS OF ACCREDITATION -- ELEMENTS OF AN ACCREDITATION PROCESS -- Accreditation Bodies -- PRIM & R and the Formation of AAHRPP -- The VA and NCQA Accreditation Process -- Eligibility Criteria and an Application Process -- Self-Evaluation -- External Evaluation -- Appeals Process -- Repeat Accreditation -- APPLYING THE MODELS TO HUMAN RESEARCH OVERSIGHT -- SOME ISSUES THAT ACCREDITATION ALONE CANNOT ADDRESS -- Identifying, Investigating, and Sanctioning Violations -- Educating Investigators -- Improving Research Monitoring |
|
WILL ACCREDITATION ENHANCE PERFORMANCE?3 Standards for Accreditation -- STANDARDS FOR STANDARDS -- DEVELOPING MEASURES TO ACCOMPANY STANDARDS -- NEED FOR STANDARDS TO ENCOMPASS MULTIPLE RESEARCH SETTINGS AND METHODS -- RELATION OF THE STANDARDS TO THE EXISTING REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS -- STANDARDS FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND SELF-STUDY -- NEED FOR STANDARDS TO ENHANCE THE ROLE OF RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS -- NEED FOR STANDARDS REGARDING ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF RESEARCH SPONSORS -- REVIEW OF AVAILABLE DRAFT STANDARDS -- Scope and Focus of the Standards |
|
PRIM & R StandardsNCQA Standards -- Relation to Existing Regulatory Requirements -- Extent to Which the Standards Can Be Implemented, Measured, and Enforced -- What Is Missing -- INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION GUIDELINE FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE -- RECOMMENDATION FOR INITIAL STANDARDS TO BEGIN PILOT TESTING -- 4 Evaluating HRPPP Pilot Accreditation Programs -- References -- Appendixes -- APPENDIX A Data Sources and Methods -- PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC COMMENT -- LITERATURE REVIEW -- DRAFT STANDARDS FOR ACCREDITATION |
| Analysis |
Andre fag (naturvidenskab og teknik) Andre fag |
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 95-102) and index |
| Notes |
Print version record |
| SUBJECT |
National Committee for Quality Assurance (U.S.) |
|
Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (Association) |
| Subject |
Human experimentation in medicine -- Standards -- United States
|
|
Informed consent (Medical law) -- United States
|
|
MEDICAL -- Laboratory Medicine.
|
|
Patients -- Civil rights
|
|
Patient advocacy
|
|
Human experimentation in medicine
|
|
Informed consent (Medical law)
|
|
United States
|
| Genre/Form |
Electronic book
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| ISBN |
0309569915 |
|
9780309569910 |
|
