| Description |
1 online resource (viii, 204, C1 : illustrations (black and white, and color)) |
| Series |
Economic analysis of law in European legal scholarship ; volume 14 |
|
Economic analysis of law in European legal scholarship ; v.14.
|
| Contents |
Introduction: Judging Is Human -- What Do We Mean by Precedent? Empirical Evidence of Ordinary Usage -- Reasonableness on the Clapham Omnibus: Exploring the Outcome-Sensitive Folk Concept of Reasonable -- "That’s Him!": Evaluating a Guilt Hypothesis in the Context of a Suspect Lineup -- Debiasing Numerical Verdicts and Judicial Discretion: Reflections on Mitigating the Anchoring Effect in Judicial Decision-Making -- Truth, Probability, and Evidence in Judicial Reasoning: The Case of the Conjunction Fallacy -- An Analytic Framework for Research on Judicial Decision-Making -- Hercules on a Diet -- The Challenges of Artificial Judicial Decision-Making for Liberal Democracy -- Correction to: the Challenges of Artificial Judicial Decision Making for Liberal Democracy |
| Summary |
This book shares state-of-the-art insights on judicial decision-making from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. It offers in-depth coverage of the forefront of the field and reviews the most important issues and discussions connected with an empirical approach to judicial decision-making. It also addresses the challenges of judicial psychology to the ideal of rule of law and explores the promise and perils of applying artificial intelligence in law. In closing, it offers empirically-driven guidance on ways to improve the quality of legal reasoning |
| Analysis |
Law |
| Notes |
Print version record |
| Subject |
Judicial process.
|
|
Law -- Decision making
|
|
Judicial process
|
|
Law -- Decision making
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| Author |
Bystranowski, Piotr, editor
|
|
Janik, Bartosz, editor
|
|
Próchnicki, Maciej, editor
|
| ISBN |
9783031117442 |
|
3031117441 |
|
