Table of Contents |
pt. I | The Internationally Wrongful Act of State | |
1. | Historical Background of the Criminalization of Aggression | 3 |
1.1. | An Overview of the jus ad bellum Before World War II | 8 |
1.1.1. | The Ancient World | 8 |
1.1.2. | The Middle Ages | 15 |
1.1.3. | Impact of the Napoleonic Wars and of the 1814--1815 Vienna Congress | 23 |
1.1.4. | Carl von Clausewitz's "On War" | 24 |
1.1.5. | Impact of the 1899 and 1907 Hague Peace Conferences | 25 |
1.1.6. | Evolution of International Legal Attitudes Toward War Under the Aegis of the League of Nations | 28 |
1.2. | Evolution of the Concept of Aggression After World War II | 38 |
1.2.1. | Work Accomplished by the United Nations War Crimes Commission | 38 |
1.2.2. | London Agreement of 8 August 1945 and the Charter of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal | 40 |
1.2.3. | International Military Tribunal for the Far East | 43 |
1.2.4. | Allied Control Council Law N2 10 | 45 |
1.2.5. | Attitudes Within the United Nations System | 46 |
1.2.6. | Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court | 56 |
| References | 62 |
2. | Elements of an Act of Aggression: An Overview of Modern International Law and Practice | 75 |
2.1. | Nature of States' Obligation to Refrain from the Threat or Use of Force in International Relations (Article 2(4) of the UN Charter) | 78 |
2.1.1. | Treaty Obligation Under Article 2(4) | 79 |
2.1.2. | Obligation Under Customary International Law | 84 |
2.1.3. | Jus cogens Obligation | 91 |
2.2. | Aggression as a Serious Breach of a Peremptory Norm of General International Law | 98 |
2.2.1. | Aggression as a Serious Breach of an Obligation Arising Under Article 2(4) of the Charter of the United Nations | 100 |
2.2.2. | Attribution of Aggression to a State Under International Law | 103 |
2.3. | Elements of an Act of Aggression Under the 1974 Definition of Aggression | 104 |
2.3.1. | "Chapeau" of the Definition | 105 |
2.3.2. | Examples of Acts of Aggression | 106 |
2.3.3. | Non-Exhaustive Character of the List | 107 |
2.3.4. | The Problem of the "First Use" of Force | 108 |
2.3.5. | The Discretionary Power of the UN Security Council | 108 |
2.4. | Exceptions to the Prohibition of the Use of Force | 109 |
2.4.1. | Charter-Based Exceptions | 110 |
2.4.2. | Charter-Related Exceptions | 122 |
2.4.3. | Extra-Charter Exceptions | 126 |
| References | 133 |
pt. II | The Individual Crime | |
3. | International Legal Foundations of the Individual Criminal Responsibility for the Crime of Aggression | 147 |
3.1. | Individual Criminal Responsibility for Aggression Committed by a State | 149 |
3.1.1. | Nuremberg Judgment | 149 |
3.1.2. | Tokyo Judgment | 161 |
3.1.3. | Trials Under the Control Council Law N2 10 | 180 |
3.1.4. | Draft Code of Offences Against the Peace and Security of Mankind | 191 |
3.1.5. | Draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind | 193 |
3.1.6. | The Crime of Aggression in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court | 195 |
3.1.7. | Individual Criminal Responsibility for the Crime of Aggression: Towards the Revival of a Legal Regime? | 195 |
| References | 196 |
4. | The Principal Approaches Towards the Criminalisation of Aggression at the National Level | 199 |
4.1. | Overview of National Criminal Laws Proscribing the Crime of Aggression | 202 |
4.1.1. | The "Nuremberg and Tokyo Model" | 202 |
4.1.2. | The "Territorial Integrity or Political Independence Model" | 207 |
4.1.3. | The "Objective War Model" | 212 |
4.1.4. | The "Treason Model" | 217 |
4.2. | Aggression as a "Leadership Crime" | 222 |
4.2.1. | Exclusion of Lower Ranking State Agents | 222 |
4.2.2. | Role of Political Leaders | 223 |
4.2.3. | Role of Military Leaders | 224 |
4.2.4. | Role of Economic Leaders | 224 |
4.2.5. | Role of Other (Religious, Social) Leaders | 225 |
4.3. | The corpus delicti of the Crime of Aggression Under Customary International Law: Material Elements | 226 |
4.3.1. | The Structure of the corpus delicti of the Crime of Aggression | 226 |
4.4. | The Qualification of "Propaganda for War" as a Separate Crime | 233 |
4.5. | The corpus delicti of the Crime of Aggression Under Customary International Law: Mental Element | 236 |
4.5.1. | Occupation of Another State | 237 |
4.5.2. | Annexation of Another State | 239 |
4.5.3. | Subjugation of Another State | 239 |
4.5.4. | Involving Another State in War | 240 |
4.5.5. | Conspiracy | 240 |
4.6. | Mechanisms of Enforcement | 241 |
4.6.1. | Indirect Enforcement (by National Courts) | 243 |
4.6.2. | Direct Enforcement (by the International Criminal Court) | 249 |
| References | 250 |
5. | The Crime of Aggression in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court | 253 |
5.1. | The Definition of the Crime of Aggression for the Purpose of the Rome Statute (Article 8 bis) | 255 |
5.1.1. | Structure of the Rome Statute's Definition of the Crime of Aggression | 256 |
5.1.2. | Conditions for the Entry into Force of Article 8 bis | 274 |
5.2. | The Crime of Aggression in the Context of the "General Part" of International Criminal Law | 275 |
5.2.1. | Nullum crimen sine lege | 276 |
5.2.2. | Nulla poena sine lege | 277 |
5.2.3. | Non-Retroactivity ratione personae | 281 |
5.2.4. | Individual Criminal Responsibility | 281 |
5.2.5. | Exclusion of Jurisdiction Over Persons Under Eighteen | 288 |
5.2.6. | Irrelevance of Official Capacity | 289 |
5.2.7. | Responsibility of Commanders and Other Superiors | 290 |
5.2.8. | Non-Applicability of Statute of Limitations | 292 |
5.2.9. | Mental Element | 293 |
5.2.10. | Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility | 293 |
5.2.11. | Mistake of Fact or Mistake of Law | 295 |
5.2.12. | Superior Orders and Prescription of Law | 297 |
5.3. | Exercise of Jurisdiction Over the Crime of Aggression | 298 |
5.3.1. | Continued Relevance of the Principle of Complementarity | 298 |
5.3.2. | State Referral, proprio motu (Article 15 bis) | 300 |
5.3.3. | Security Council Referral (Article 15 ter) | 311 |
5.4. | The Elements of Crimes for the Crime of Aggression | 312 |
| References | 314 |
6. | Conclusion | 321 |
| References | 326 |
| Index | 327 |