Comparative law as discipline -- Critique and comparison -- Navigating the mainstreams -- Orientalizing comparative law's occident -- Muslim veiling: critique of a comparative discourse -- Human rights and narratives of justification -- Before the law: the discourse about 'access to justice' -- Thick comparison?
Summary
"This book presents a critique of conventional ways to do comparative law. The author argues that, for comparative law to qualify as a discipline, comparatists must reflect on how and why they compare. The author discusses not only methods and theories, but also the ethical implications and the politics of comparative law."
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index
Notes
Online resource; title from title screen (Elgaronline, viewed on April 9, 2018)
