Limit search to available items
E-book
Author Lohaus, Phillip, author

Title A precarious balance : preserving the right mix of conventional and special operations forces / by Phillip Lohaus
Published Washington, DC : American Enterprise Institute, 2014
©2014

Copies

Description 1 online resource (vii, 75 pages) : illustrations, maps
Contents Executive summary. -- Introduction. -- US conventional and special operations forces since World War II. -- Afghanistan, Iraq, and the ascendancy of US special operations forces. -- Current dynamics. -- Policy implications and outlook. -- Conclusion. -- Notes. -- Acknowledgments. -- About the author
Summary Many crises are best addressed with the innovation and discreetness of SOF, but others require the mass that only conventional forces bring to bear. More often than not, successful military campaigns involve some mixture of both conventional and special operations forces, but tensions between the two have impeded successful cooperation in the past. Special operations forces are the military's innovators; conventional forces are the military's amplifiers. These are complementary capabilities. History reveals that the relationship between conventional and special operations forces is cyclical and governed by two primary factors: a competition for resources and a lack of understanding between the two kinds of forces. Current plans to expand US Special Operations Command threaten to repeat this cyclical pattern, creating a dangerous imbalance. To maximize the effectiveness of both conventional and special operations forces, their roles must be carefully delineated, giving maximum flexibility to the overall force. As the military's innovators, special operations forces should maintain responsibility for direct-action missions and covert and clandestine foreign military assistance and should establish a mechanism to train conventional forces in the art of the indirect approach. As the military's amplifiers, the conventional force should take responsibility for certain missions currently assigned to special operations forces, such as foreign internal defense, most psychological operations, and civil affairs
Bibliography Includes bibliographical references (pages 61-71)
Notes Online resource; title from PDF title page (AEI, viewed November 3, 2014)
Subject Special forces (Military science) -- United States -- Evaluation
Special forces (Military science) -- United States -- History
Military planning -- United States
Armed Forces -- Evaluation.
Military planning.
Military policy.
Special forces (Military science)
Special forces (Military science) -- Evaluation.
SUBJECT United States -- Armed Forces -- Evaluation
United States -- Military policy. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85140379
Subject United States.
Genre/Form History.
Form Electronic book
Author American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, publisher