Limit search to available items
Book Cover
Book
Author Mathur, Sushma, 1969-

Title Community aged care packages : how do they compare
Published Canberra : Australian Govt. Pub. Service, 1997

Copies

Location Call no. Vol. Availability
 W'PONDS  362.6 Aus/Acs  1997/32  AVAILABLE
Description viii, 97 pages ; 30 cm
regular print
Series Aged and community care service development and evaluation reports ; no. 32
Aged and community care service development and evaluation reports ; no. 32
Contents 1. Introduction -- 2. Data sources and constraints -- Community aged care packages -- Community options projects -- Hostels -- Summary -- 3. Client profiles -- Age and sex -- What social support is available? -- How are clients referred? -- How dependant are care package clients? -- Summary -- 4. Comparison of care package clients, community options clients, and hostel residents -- Introduction -- Comparing age and sex profiles -- How does social support compare? -- Pension status -- Indigenous peoples -- Non-English speaking background -- How do dependency levels compare? -- Summary -- 5. Care package providers -- Introduction -- How many services? How many packages? -- Type of service -- How accessible are care packages? -- Summary -- 6. Service utilisation -- Introduction -- How much help do clients receive? -- Which clients receive the most services? -- Summary
Summary This report is based on data from the national community aged care packages survey conducted by the Department of Health and Family Services in 1996. It examines client characteristics, patterns of service provision and patterns of service use, and includes comparisons with community options clients and hostel residents. The vast majority of care package clients were aged over 70. Overall women predominated. Living alone was the most common type of living arrangement for care package clients, followed by living with their spouse. Most clients had either a co-resident or a visiting carer. Carers of care package clients were most likely to be related to the client. Referrals to care package providers came mainly from within the aged care service system. On the basis of a dependency scale score calculated from data on 14 items, it appears that community aged care package clients were quite a dependent population. Care package clients were generally older than community options clients and were most likely to live alone across the client groups. They were less likely to have a co-resident care available than community options clients. Community options projects had the highest proportion of indigenous service users and community aged care packages had the highest proportion of clients from a non-English speaking background. Care package clients were the least dependent across the three client groups and personal care hostel residents were the most dependent. The most common type of service provider was "other community and government". Assessment for entry to these services was generally carried out by both the service provider and an aged care assessment team. More services provided priority of access to financially disadvantaged clients than to indigenous Australians or those from a non-English speaking background. The most common reason given by agencies for not providing services to potential clients were the shortage of care package place, or that clients' needs were too complex to be dealt with.are pla
Notes "August 1997"
At foot of title: Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services; Australian Institute of Health & Welfare
Bibliography Bibliography: pages 96-97
Notes DHFS (AGAC) publication
Commonwealth of Australia 1997
In Aged and community care service development and evaluation reports no:32
Subject Community Aged Care Packages Program (Australia)
Older people -- Home care -- Australia -- Statistics.
Older people -- Services for -- Australia -- Statistics.
Home care services -- Utilization -- Australia -- Statistics.
Home care services -- Australia -- Statistics.
Aged.
Community Health Services.
Government Programs.
Housing for the Elderly.
SUBJECT Australia. https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001315
Genre/Form Evaluation Studies.
Author Evans, Ann.
Gibson, Diane, 1954-
Australia. Department of Health and Family Services.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
LC no. 97331540
ISBN 0644382791