| Description |
1 online resource |
| Series |
Defense, security and strategies |
|
American political, economic, and security issues |
| Contents |
SEXUAL ASSAULT AND HARASSMENT IN THE U.S. MILITARY; SEXUAL ASSAULT AND HARASSMENT IN THE U.S. MILITARY; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1 PREVENTING SEXUAL HARASSMENT: DOD NEEDS GREATER LEADERSHIP COMMITMENT AND AN OVERSIGHT FRAMEWORK; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; DOD HAS A POLICY AND A PROGRAM TO PREVENT AND ADDRESS INCIDENTS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT INVOLVING SERVICEMEMBERS, BUT OPPORTUNITIES EXIST FOR IMPROVEMENT; DOD Has a Long-standing Policy and a Program |
|
Servicemembers Have Mixed Views about Their Leaders' Support for DOD's Sexual Harassment Policies and ProgramsRequired Climate Assessments Are Not Always Conducted; DOD Does Not Have Adequate Guidance on How Incidents of Sexual Harassment Should Be Handled in Joint Environments; DOD HAS LIMITED VISIBILITY OVER THE OCCURRENCE OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT INVOLVING ACTIVE DUTY SERVICEMEMBERS; DOD's Available Data for Complaints of Sexual Harassment Is Incomplete and Inconsistent; Servicemembers Are More Likely to Resolve Sexual Harassment Complaints Informally |
|
DOD HAS LIMITED OVERSIGHT OF ITS SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICIES AND PROGRAMSCONCLUSION; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION; AGENCY COMMENTS AND OUR EVALUATION; APPENDIX I: SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY; End Notes; End Notes for Appendix I; Chapter 2 MILITARY JUSTICE: OVERSIGHT AND BETTER COLLABORATION NEEDED FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT INVESTIGATIONS AND ADJUDICATIONS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; The Military Justice System; Investigative and Judge Advocate Guidance and Procedures; Roles and Responsibilities of the DOD Inspector General |
|
DOD's Sexual Assault Prevention and Response ProgramDOD INSPECTOR GENERAL'S OFFICE HAS NOT PERFORMED ITS DESIGNATED POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT INVESTIGATIONS; DOD Inspector General's Office Has Not Developed a Policy for Sexual Assault Investigations; The DOD Inspector General's Office Is Not Conducting Oversight of Sexual Assault Investigations or Related Training; THE SERVICES ARE NOT MAXIMIZING OPPORTUNITIES TO LEVERAGE RESOURCES PROVIDED FOR INVESTIGATIONS AND ADJUDICATIONS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT INCIDENTS |
|
The Military Services Provide Personnel Who Advise and Assist on Investigations and Adjudications of Sexual AssaultInvestigative and Legal Organizations Receive Fiscal Resources to Enhance Investigations and Adjudications of Sexual Assault Incidents; Service Investigative Organizations and Judge Advocate Offices Are Not Maximizing Opportunities to Leverage Expertise and Limited Resources; DOD HAS EXPRESSED CONCERNS WITH ARTICLE 120 REVISIONS; CONCLUSION; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION; AGENCY COMMENTS AND OUR EVALUATION; APPENDIX I: SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY; End Notes |
| Notes |
Includes three reports prepared by the United States Government Accountability Office |
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Notes |
Print version record |
| Subject |
Sexual harassment in the military -- Law and legislation -- United States
|
|
HISTORY -- Military -- Other.
|
|
TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING -- Military Science.
|
|
Sexual harassment in the military -- Law and legislation
|
|
United States
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| Author |
Chaney, Quinton
|
|
Merrill, Karen R
|
|
United States. Government Accountability Office.
|
| LC no. |
2020677252 |
| ISBN |
9781619425125 |
|
1619425122 |
|
