Pal's nomination and attitude towards the tribunal -- The dissentient judgement and its aftermath -- Rise into the elite society of Calcutta -- A conservative nationalist -- The creation of the "Pal myth" -- The "Pal myth" and the neonationalist movement -- Conclusion
Summary
This study examines the effect of Radhabinod Pal's judgment at the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal, in which he boldly dissented from the majority opinion and held that all Japanese defendants were not guilty. It also explores how historical revisionists have utilized and propagated his judgment in postwar Japanese right-wing politics
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index
Notes
Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on April 11, 2016)
