| Description |
1 online resource (v, 53 pages) |
| Series |
A special report from the Strategic Studies Institute |
|
Special report (Army War College (U.S.). Strategic Studies Institute)
|
| Contents |
Panel I: Setting the framework -- U.S. security requirements and policy realities for the next millennium -- Keynote address: An update on the Quadrennial Defense Review / John T. White. Panel II: Landpower in the 21st century -- The non-revolution in military affairs / Don Snider -- Beyond Force XXI: envisioning the Army After Next / David M. Maddox -- The Army, joint operations and the Quadrennial Defense Review / Jay M. Garner. Panel III: Seapower in the 21st century -- Naval contributions to joint warfare in the 21st century / John E. Rhodes -- The naval philosophy for the QDR / Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. -- Naval forces and the RMA: fact or fiction? / David A. Rosenberg -- Luncheon address, The Quadrennial Defense Review: a joint perspective / Mark R. Hamilton. Panel IV: Air power in the 21st century -- The changing nature of air power / Caroline F. Ziemke -- The USAF into the 21st century / Larry D. Welch -- The changing dynamic of strategic attack / Mark J. Conversino -- Summation: The issues in perspective / Andrew J. Goodpaster |
| Summary |
In March 1996, Colonel Jim Blundell of the Association of the United States Army's Institute for Land Warfare and Dr. Earl H. Tilford, Jr., of the U.S. Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute envisioned a symposium that would bring all the services together for an open and honest meeting aimed at defining the complex issues that will face the services individually and the Department of Defense corporately during the Joint Strategy Review and Quadrennial Defense Review process. This symposium brought together men and women, soldiers, airmen, marines, and civilians from government, industry, academia, and the media to speak and, more importantly, to listen. Every speaker, even those who were clearly the specified advocates for their respective services, emphasized both the need for the current QDR and the absolute conclusion that defending the United States is and will remain a joint endeavor. The honest and forthright exchange of ideas, concepts, and opinions furthered the process and, quite possibly, pushed the Department of Defense closer to a successful QDR. The QDR is an event of extreme importance for the Department of Defense, the individual services, and for the American people. What is at stake is the future capability of the nation's military |
| Notes |
Title from title screen (viewed October 18, 2001) |
|
"June 6, 1997." |
|
A report on a symposium held February 1997, comprised of four panels and three special addresses; cosponsored by the U.S. Army War College, Association of the United States Army, U.S. Naval War College, and the Atlantic Council of the United States |
|
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212 MiAaHDL |
|
digitized 2011 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve pda MiAaHDL |
| Subject |
Security, International -- Congresses
|
|
National security -- United States -- Congresses
|
|
Air power -- United States -- Congresses
|
|
Sea-power -- United States -- Congresses
|
|
Military planning -- United States -- Congresses
|
|
Twenty-first century -- Congresses
|
|
Air power.
|
|
Military planning.
|
|
Military readiness.
|
|
National security.
|
|
Sea-power.
|
|
Security, International.
|
|
Twenty-first century.
|
| SUBJECT |
United States -- Defenses -- Congresses
|
| Subject |
United States.
|
| Genre/Form |
Conference papers and proceedings.
|
|
Conference papers and proceedings.
|
|
Actes de congrès.
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| Author |
Army War College (U.S.). Strategic Studies Institute.
|
|
Association of the United States Army
|
|
Naval War College (U.S.)
|
|
Atlantic Council of the United States
|
|
