| Description |
1 online resource |
| Contents |
Introduction -- Media framing and effects on public opinion -- Comprehensive immigration reform -- The DREAM act and DREAMers -- Framing deportations in the news media and public opinion -- What's in a name: illegal, undocumented, or unauthorized? -- Conclusions |
| Summary |
While undocumented immigration is controversial, the general public is largely unfamiliar with the particulars of immigration policy. Given that public opinion on the topic is malleable, to what extent do mass media shape the public debate on immigration? In Framing Immigrants, political scientists Chris Haynes, Jennifer Merolla, and Karthick Ramakrishnan explore how conservative, liberal, and mainstream news outlets frame and discuss undocumented immigrants. Drawing from original voter surveys, they show that how the media frames immigration has significant consequences for public opinion and has implications for the passage of new immigration policies. The authors analyze media coverage of several key immigration policy issues -- including mass deportations, comprehensive immigration reform, and measures focused on immigrant children, such as the DREAM Act -- to chart how news sources across the ideological spectrum produce specific "frames" for the immigration debate. In the past few years, liberal and mainstream outlets have tended to frame immigrants lacking legal status as "undocumented" (rather than "illegal") and to approach the topic of legalization through human-interest stories, often mentioning children. Conservative outlets, on the other hand, tend to discuss legalization using impersonal statistics and invoking the rule of law. Yet, regardless of the media's ideological positions, the authors' surveys show that "negative" frames more strongly influence public support for different immigration policies than do positive frames. For instance, survey participants who were exposed to language portraying immigrants as law-breakers seeking "amnesty" tended to oppose legalization measures. At the same time, support for legalization was higher when participants were exposed to language referring to immigrants living in the United States for a decade or more. Framing Immigrants shows that despite heated debates on immigration across the political aisle, the general public has yet to form a consistent position on undocumented immigrants. By analyzing how the media influences public opinion, this book provides a valuable resource for immigration advocates, policymakers, and researchers. CHRIS HAYNES is assistant professor of political science at the University of New Haven. JENNIFER MEROLLA is professor of political science at the University of California, Riverside S. KARTHICK RAMAKRISHNAN is professor of public policy and political science at the University of California, Riverside |
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Notes |
Online resource; title from PDF title page (JSTOR platform, viewed January 9, 2023) |
| Subject |
Mass media and immigrants.
|
|
Immigrants -- Press coverage
|
|
Emigration and immigration -- Press coverage.
|
|
SOCIAL SCIENCE -- Discrimination & Race Relations.
|
|
SOCIAL SCIENCE -- Minority Studies.
|
|
SOCIAL SCIENCE -- General.
|
|
Emigration and immigration -- Press coverage
|
|
Immigrants -- Press coverage
|
|
Mass media and immigrants
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| Author |
Merolla, Jennifer Lee, 1975- author.
|
|
Ramakrishnan, S. Karthick (Subramanian Karthick), 1975- author.
|
| LC no. |
2016022185 |
| ISBN |
9781610448604 |
|
161044860X |
|
