The Pilot-Judgment Procedure of the EuropeanCourtofHumanRights ; Copyright ; Contents ; Preface ; Abbreviations ; PART ONE: INTRODUCTION ; 1. The Overload of the Strasbourg System ; 2. The Steps of Examination to be Conducted
PART TWO: CONTEXT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PILOT-JUDGMENT PROCEDURE 3. Overview ; 4. Judicial Development Leading to Pilot Judgments ; 4.1 Excessive Length of Judicial Proceedings ; 4.2 Kudla v Poland ; 4.3 Assanidze v Georgia ; 4.4 Scozzari and Giunta v Italy
5. Political Context and Development 5.1 The Reform Process ; 5.2 Further Development ; 6. Conclusion ; PART THREE: ELEMENTS OF THE PILOT-JUDGMENT PROCEDURE ; 7. Overview ; 8. Definitions ; 8.1 Repetitive Applications ; 8.2 Systemic Problems
9. The Elements of the Pilot-Judgment Procedure 9.1 Examination of a Systemic Problem ; 9.2 Indication of Remedial Measures ; 9.3 Adjournment of Proceedings ; 9.4 Procedural Steps after a Pilot-Judgment ; 9.5 Conferral to the Grand Chamber? ; 10. Conclusion
PART FOUR: THE CONTRACTING STATES' OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONVENTION 11. Overview ; 12. Obligation to Implement the Convention ; 12.1 Public International Law ; 12.2 The Convention ; 12.3 Application of these Principles: Failures to Implement the Convention
Summary
In The Pilot-Judgment Procedure of the EuropeanCourtofHumanRights Dominik Haider examines if this recent approach to tackle structural humanrights deficiencies in member states is reconcilable with the European Convention on HumanRights
